defended bestiality advocate Karen Winter:

> chico chupacabra wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
>>
>>>chico chupacabra wrote:
>>>
>>>>Archie Bunker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Is it the sentiment among Episcopalians that sex with small
>>>>>>>animals is included in this "sexual immorality" which St Paul
>>>>>>>tells the church in Corinth to flee? Or is this kind of behavior
>>>>>>>okay now since the Holy Spirit has obviated most of the Pauline
>>>>>>>Epistles? Would your parish object if she brought one of her
>>>>>>>little "friends" with her to church the same way she has her
>>>>>>>FAS-defective ******* partner, and maybe even got its jollies
>>>>>>>with her during, say, vespers? Or is it all perfectly reasonable
>>>>>>>for "anglo catholics" to "glorify God" in their bodies and
>>>>>>>spirits by diddling with critters?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Discuss.
>>>>>
>>>>>I guess I better stop letting the dog hump my leg..or should I say
>>>>>ankle since he is a chihuahua. HA HA HA HA
>>>>
>>>>The issue according to Karen is whether your dog has a "preference"
>>>>for sex with your leg, ankle, or humans in general, over and above a
>>>>preference for sex with other dogs. I've never known a dog to have a
>>>>foot/ankle/lower leg fetish, aside from eating up shoes on
>>>>occasion. If your chihuahua prefers sex with your ankle or with
>>>>you, then she thinks it's perfectly acceptable for you to "cuddle
>>>>up with it on the couch" and alienate your human companionship for
>>>>a little animal sex:
>>>>
>>>> ...[S]ome animals don't want a mate of their own species,
>>>>just as some humans don't. We may think it is better for a human to
>>>> get out, mingle with other humans, find a human partner.
>>>>But some humans just want to curl up on the couch or go out hiking
>>>> with their companion dog or cat. I think we need to respect
>>>> such personal preferences. As long as no *harm* is being
>>>>done to another, we have no right to tell another human, OR another
>>>> non-human, how to live his/her life, or who to live it with.
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/m7ff8
>>>>
>>>>BTW and nevermind sex, have you ever considered hiking with a CAT? I
>>>>don't know where she comes up with her examples, but I guess it's
>>>>to be expected from someone who feels special and that it was
>>>>"sweet" that a bird got off in her hand.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>just kidding! It does seem a bit odd letting an animal get off on
>>>>>your hand.
>>>>
>>>>*Very* odd, and thanks for your reply. Anyone else out there think
>>>>it's a bit queer? Anyone care to defend Karen, her "regularly"
>>>>having sexual relations with a small animal, and/or bestiality in
>>>>general?
>>>
>>> If what you say about her is true,
>>
>>It is. Click on the links and you can read her posts that I
>>quoted yourself.
>>
>>
>>> she needs prayer not personal attacks.
>>
>>To paraphrase St James,
>> If one of you says to her, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and
>> stop molesting animals," but does nothing about her *real*
>> [mental health] needs, what good is it?
>>
>>
>>>Joh 8:7 - So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and
>>>said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a
>>>stone at her.
>>
>> ...Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn
>> thee: GO, AND *SIN NO MORE*.
>> John 8:11
>>
>>She needs more than prayer, and she's the least bit embarrassed by
>>jacking off a little bird.
>>
>> ...I think we made his last years as happy as was possible for
>> him... If he wanted to use my hand as a sex toy, I wasn't going
>> to forbid him.
>> http://tinyurl.com/p4vrc
>>
>> I thought it was rather sweet, in fact. He certainly was a
>> happier bird with me than with the other 'tiels.
>> http://tinyurl.com/rvyua
>>
>>Look up her old posts when she used her "rat" pseudonym on the issue of
>>zoophilia and you'll find she's an impenitent apologist for the
>>practice of animal molestation.
>
>
> Glad you are without sin. Can you walk
> on water also?

I haven't tried lately.

> Mt 7:1 - Judge not, that ye be not judged.

How can you avoid that which you don't judge?
Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and
avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus
Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches
deceive the hearts of the simple.
Romans 16:17-18

How can you separate from those involved in outwardly sinful lifestyles
if you ignore their sin?
Come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord
2 Corinthians 6:17

Why would you ignore the darkness and have fellowship with it?
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness,
but rather reprove them.
Ephesians 5:1 1

Etc.