View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 13-08-2006, 08:23 PM posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan
chico chupacabra chico chupacabra is offline
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Default Question for Chumpo

pearl wrote:

Every objection you had is exposed as a sham.

My objections stand.


Every objection you had is


Fully sustained. Karen's diddling with her bird wasn't for any
commercial or reproductive purpose. She saw it as "sweet" and gets off
on the idea that the bird liked her more than it liked other birds.

Cattle farmers aren't wanking bulls for pleasure.

They're certainly giving the bulls 'pleasure'. Go on - try denying it.


They're not engaged in the pursuit of their own OR the bulls' pleasure,


They're


not engaged in their own or the bulls' pleasure. It's applesranges to
compare their jobs to Karen's perversion.