chico chupacabra wrote:
> wrote:
>
> >
> > chico chupacabra wrote:
> > > Archie Bunker wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>Is it the sentiment among Episcopalians that sex with small
> > > >>>animals is included in this "sexual immorality" which St Paul
> > > >>>tells the church in Corinth to flee? Or is this kind of behavior
> > > >>>okay now since the Holy Spirit has obviated most of the Pauline
> > > >>>Epistles? Would your parish object if she brought one of her
> > > >>>little "friends" with her to church the same way she has her
> > > >>>FAS-defective ******* partner, and maybe even got its jollies
> > > >>>with her during, say, vespers? Or is it all perfectly reasonable
> > > >>>for "anglo catholics" to "glorify God" in their bodies and
> > > >>>spirits by diddling with critters?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Discuss.
> > > >
> > > > I guess I better stop letting the dog hump my leg..or should I say
> > > > ankle since he is a chihuahua. HA HA HA HA
> > >
> > > The issue according to Karen is whether your dog has a "preference"
> > > for sex with your leg, ankle, or humans in general, over and above a
> > > preference for sex with other dogs. I've never known a dog to have a
> > > foot/ankle/lower leg fetish, aside from eating up shoes on
> > > occasion. If your chihuahua prefers sex with your ankle or with
> > > you, then she thinks it's perfectly acceptable for you to "cuddle
> > > up with it on the couch" and alienate your human companionship for
> > > a little animal sex:
> > >
> > > ...[S]ome animals don't want a mate of their own species,
> > > just as some humans don't. We may think it is better for a human to
> > > get out, mingle with other humans, find a human partner.
> > > But some humans just want to curl up on the couch or go out hiking
> > > with their companion dog or cat. I think we need to respect
> > > such personal preferences. As long as no *harm* is being
> > > done to another, we have no right to tell another human, OR another
> > > non-human, how to live his/her life, or who to live it with.
> > > http://tinyurl.com/m7ff8
> > >
> > > BTW and nevermind sex, have you ever considered hiking with a CAT? I
> > > don't know where she comes up with her examples, but I guess it's
> > > to be expected from someone who feels special and that it was
> > > "sweet" that a bird got off in her hand.
> > >
> > > > just kidding! It does seem a bit odd letting an animal get off on
> > > > your hand.
> > >
> > > *Very* odd, and thanks for your reply. Anyone else out there think
> > > it's a bit queer? Anyone care to defend Karen, her "regularly"
> > > having sexual relations with a small animal, and/or bestiality in
> > > general?
> >
> > If what you say about her is true,
>
> It is. Click on the links and you can read her posts that I
> quoted yourself.
>
> > she needs prayer not personal attacks.
>
> To paraphrase St James,
> If one of you says to her, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and
> stop molesting animals," but does nothing about her *real*
> [mental health] needs, what good is it?
>
> > Joh 8:7 - So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and
> > said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a
> > stone at her.
>
> ...Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn
> thee: GO, AND *SIN NO MORE*.
> John 8:11
>
> She needs more than prayer, and she's the least bit embarrassed by
> jacking off a little bird.
>
> ...I think we made his last years as happy as was possible for
> him... If he wanted to use my hand as a sex toy, I wasn't going
> to forbid him.
> http://tinyurl.com/p4vrc
>
> I thought it was rather sweet, in fact. He certainly was a
> happier bird with me than with the other 'tiels.
> http://tinyurl.com/rvyua
>
> Look up her old posts when she used her "rat" pseudonym on the issue of
> zoophilia and you'll find she's an impenitent apologist for the
> practice of animal molestation.

Glad you are without sin. Can you walk
on water also?

Jim



Mt 7:1 - Judge not, that ye be not judged.