chico chupacabra wrote:
> Archie Bunker wrote:
>
> >>>Is it the sentiment among Episcopalians that sex with small animals is
> >>>included in this "sexual immorality" which St Paul tells the church in
> >>>Corinth to flee? Or is this kind of behavior okay now since the Holy
> >>>Spirit has obviated most of the Pauline Epistles? Would your parish
> >>>object if she brought one of her little "friends" with her to church the
> >>>same way she has her FAS-defective ******* partner, and maybe even got
> >>>its jollies with her during, say, vespers? Or is it all perfectly
> >>>reasonable for "anglo catholics" to "glorify God" in their bodies and
> >>>spirits by diddling with critters?
> >>>
> >>>Discuss.
> >
> > I guess I better stop letting the dog hump my leg..or should I say
> > ankle since he is a chihuahua. HA HA HA HA
>
> The issue according to Karen is whether your dog has a "preference" for
> sex with your leg, ankle, or humans in general, over and above a
> preference for sex with other dogs. I've never known a dog to have a
> foot/ankle/lower leg fetish, aside from eating up shoes on occasion. If
> your chihuahua prefers sex with your ankle or with you, then she thinks
> it's perfectly acceptable for you to "cuddle up with it on the couch"
> and alienate your human companionship for a little animal sex:
>
> ...[S]ome animals don't want a mate of their own species, just
> as some humans don't. We may think it is better for a human to
> get out, mingle with other humans, find a human partner. But
> some humans just want to curl up on the couch or go out hiking
> with their companion dog or cat. I think we need to respect
> such personal preferences. As long as no *harm* is being done
> to another, we have no right to tell another human, OR another
> non-human, how to live his/her life, or who to live it with.
> http://tinyurl.com/m7ff8
>
> BTW and nevermind sex, have you ever considered hiking with a CAT? I
> don't know where she comes up with her examples, but I guess it's to be
> expected from someone who feels special and that it was "sweet" that a
> bird got off in her hand.
>
> > just kidding! It does seem a bit odd letting an animal get off on your
> > hand.
>
> *Very* odd, and thanks for your reply. Anyone else out there think it's
> a bit queer? Anyone care to defend Karen, her "regularly" having sexual
> relations with a small animal, and/or bestiality in general?

If what you say about her is true,
she needs prayer not personal attacks.

Jim



Joh 8:7 - So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and
said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a
stone at her.