> The thing is that few, or no, AR supporters *categorically* condemn
> meat *eating*. Most would agree that it is morally permissible
> to eat an animal that died naturally of old age or in an accident
> (e.g. -- roadkill you did not cause). What AR supporters categorically
> condem is the processes involved in producing meat, especially
> commercially sold meat. It is the abuse, suffering, hampering of
> normal behavior, killing, that AR supporters condemn. It is exactly
> the same with the issue of sexual abuse of animals by humans.
>
I just categorically don't eat anything that had a mother. Or eyes. Or
brains. Like EUGH!! So here we go, how about this:
Hi. My name is Misterina. I *categorically* condemn meat *eating*.
*grin*
> Having been a vegetarian for over 20 years, I would gag at the
> thought of eating any meat, even roadkill. But I would not want
> to pass a law forbidding people to eat roadkill or use it to feed
> carnivores who are being rehabilitated in a wildlife facility.
> Similarly, Pearl is revolted by the thought of sexual activity with
> a non-human under any circumstances.
Is THAT what is happening? I was confused for a moment there. I thought
those other ones *points* were saying she DOES support this kind of
activity. Pearl I ALMOST lost faith in you there
I figured that was a bit
of an odd thing to condone...
> But undoubtedly this concept is too difficult for you to understand --
> or you will pretend it is.
Either way, quite a shame that, isn't it just! Wasting away one's god given
blessings in such a manner *tsk.tsk*
)