"chico chupacabra" > wrote in message ...

pearl wrote:
>
> > > <...>
> > > >>>Or as Karen Winter put it:
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > > I don't think I have a right to prevent people by force
> > > > from doing things which cause no harm to another,
> > > > human or animal.
> > >
> > > IOW, you don't object to humans ****ing animals. Case closed.
> >
> > What case?
>
> Exactly, you never had one.

YOU never had one, liar.

> > I told you back then that I think it is a perversion.
>
> Yet you've never categorically condemned it

condemnation
1. an expression of strong disapproval; pronouncing
as wrong or morally culpable
http://www.answers.com/condemnation&r=67

> the same way you have eating meat. Why is that,
>Why do you find it wrong to eat an animal's flesh but permissible
> to sexually abuse it?

Because it might not cause harm or distress as meat eating does.

> > Whether I think there should be a law against it is another question.
>
> You keep confirming the fact that you're pro-bestiality.

No. You just keep intentionally mis-interpreting what I'm saying.