Glorfindel wrote:
> Leif Erikson wrote:
>
>> pearl wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> And just to be clear, you *do* endorse bestiality:
>>>>
>>>> *As long as the feelings are mutual*,
>>>> and there's *no coercion or force involved,* why
>>>> should you be concerned? Personally, I have no
>>>> problem with people's personal choices *as long as
>>>> they don't harm or cause distress to another*- be it
>>>> human or animal. [emphasis in original]
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/dwzj7
>
>
>>> From an AR point of view.
>
>
>>> From a sex-with-animals point of view. You endorse it.
>
>
> That is a logical fallacy.
No.
> She does not endorse it,
She endorses it. Her quote proves it.