pearl wrote:
> "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message oups.com...
> > pearl wrote:
> > > "William" > wrote in message ...
>
> > > > If I had I would still have rejected her principles. It doesn't follow that because
> > > > Pearl married a skinhead that she would be one herself.
> > >
> > > That's the truth of it.
> >
> > Bullshit. You adopted the outward appearance, and you talked the talk,
> > even if you didn't fully walk the walk. For all intents and purposes,
> > you *were* a skinhead during the time you were married to that violent
> > felon.
>
> Bullshit. I did not.

Bullshit. You did, too.

> I wouldn't even know where to start.

You started with shaving your head. You continued by marrying a
violent skinhead felon.

>
> > > > > In any case, lesley married her skinhead, and adopted the outward appearance of
> > > > > being one herself.
> > > >
> > > > You're backpedaling. Adopting the outward appearance is a long way short of actually
> > > > being one.
> > >
> > > Just to be clear: I did *not* adopt the style, look, dress, haircut, or anything else.
> >
> > That's a lie, you dirty foot-rubbing Chelsea.
>
> No.

Yes, you lying slut.


> > And just to be clear, you *do* endorse bestiality:
> >
> > *As long as the feelings are mutual*,
> > and there's *no coercion or force involved,* why
> > should you be concerned? Personally, I have no
> > problem with people's personal choices *as long as
> > they don't harm or cause distress to another*- be it
> > human or animal. [emphasis in original]
> > http://tinyurl.com/dwzj7
>
> From an AR point of view.

>From a sex-with-animals point of view. You endorse it.