pearl wrote:
> "William" > wrote in message ...
> >
> > "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> > ink.net...
> > > Billy Blight wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> > >> ink.net...
> > >>
> > >>>Billy Blight wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> > rthlink.net...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Billy Blight wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> > . earthlink.net...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>cut
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>It's the other way around.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>I don't believe you
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>You're an idiot-by-choice, billy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Because I refuse to accept your second-hand lies
> > >>>
> > >>>Because you're mentally damaged.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> My faculties are in peek condition.
> > >
> > > Nope. They're so damaged, you misspelled "peak" as "peek". You are
> > > stupid-by-choice.
> > >
> > Actually, I was trying to be funny. Oh well.
>
> .
>
> > >>>>>She married a skinhead.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>He married a vegan.
> > >>>
> > >>>She married a skinhead.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I went out with a hard-nosed capitalist for quite a while.
> > >
> > > You should have stayed with her. Or maybe it was him.
> >
> > If I had I would still have rejected her principles. It doesn't follow that because
> > Pearl married a skinhead that she would be one herself.
>
> That's the truth of it.

Bullshit. You adopted the outward appearance, and you talked the talk,
even if you didn't fully walk the walk. For all intents and purposes,
you *were* a skinhead during the time you were married to that violent
felon.


> > > In any case, lesley married her skinhead, and adopted the outward appearance of
> > > being one herself.
> >
> > You're backpedaling. Adopting the outward appearance is a long way short of actually
> > being one.
>
> Just to be clear: I did *not* adopt the style, look, dress, haircut, or anything else.

That's a lie, you dirty foot-rubbing Chelsea.

And just to be clear, you *do* endorse bestiality:

*As long as the feelings are mutual*,
and there's *no coercion or force involved,* why
should you be concerned? Personally, I have no
problem with people's personal choices *as long as
they don't harm or cause distress to another*- be it
human or animal. [emphasis in original]
http://tinyurl.com/dwzj7