View Single Post
  #66 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 28-07-2006, 01:54 PM posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals
William[_2_] William[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 42
Default Where's everybody gone?


"chico chupacabra" wrote in message
...
William wrote:

He was a lying criminal
Then how can you believe him, and why repeat his lies as being the truth about
Pearl?
This hate campaign against Pearl is over before it starts if the ONLY evidence
supporting it comes from someone you know to be a lying criminal. LOL

cut
She willingly had plenty to do with him, and therefore is most likely
quite comfortable with dishonesty.


No. You only have the word of a lying criminal to go on.


A criminal she willfully married.


A lying criminal you willingly believe.

That should tell you something of her character. Rather, lack of it.


The same must also apply to you then.

Also, Goo has a list of absurd things
that she believes, and she insists she doesn't believe in some of them
though amusingly she can't say which of them she thinks she doesn't
believe in...even when asked!


I've seen her reject at least two items on that list today. Read her posts.


She didn't reject it outright, dummy. Go back and look. It was qualified in every
clause:
"*IF* it's contrary to an animals' [sic] instinct *AND* requires
conditioning *OR* abuse..."

Why can't she just come right out and categorically say, "It's always wrong to
molest animals"?


She sees artificial insemination as a kind of rape for crying out loud, so I'd say
that she does believe it's always wrong to molest animals.

This is a very strange situation indeed,


The only strange situation going on here is your hate campaign against her and
your
refusal to accept the fact that she rejects at least two of the things you're all
accusing
her of.


She didn't reject it outright, dummy. Go back and look. It was qualified in every
clause:
"*IF* it's contrary to an animals' [sic] instinct *AND* requires
conditioning *OR* abuse..."

Why can't she just come right out and categorically say, "It's always wrong to
molest animals"?


I believe she already has done.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com