Leif Erikson wrote:
> William wrote:
>
> > "Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> > .net...
> >
> >>William wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> thlink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>William wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Leif Erikson" > wrote in message
> arthlink.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>William wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I wasn't talking about Lesley. I was talking about Pearl,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>That's lesley, you dummy. "pearl" is her ****witted pseudonym.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Sorry. I didn't know that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>She is anything but a pearl; more like a
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>jagged piece of broken glass from a cheap bottle of beer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>yawn
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>and having an open mind about her beliefs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>You don't really mean to have an open mind about them, dumb-ass. What you mean
> >>>>>>is to be predisposed to accept them because they're new-age kooky.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Apart from a few items on that list I'm open-minded the rest and
> >>>>>believe some of them.
> >>>>
> >>>>Exactly. You are predisposed to accepting at face value any new-age kooky
> >>>>bullshit that appears to go against common sense, and that plays to your perverse
> >>>>need to be "different". You misinterpret this as "open-mindedness". It isn't
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I agree - it isn't "open-mindedness." Being open-minded is all about being
> >>>receptive of others' ideas and beliefs.
> >>
> >>No, that is *NOT* what being open-minded is
> >
> >
> > Yes it is.
> >
> > [snip crap]
>
> No, it isn't.
>
>
> >
> > "Being open-minded is all about being receptive of others' ideas and beliefs."
>


> Wrong. That dictionary definition is simply bullshit.


LOL!!!

Now Goober is going to rewrite Webster's.

What a retard!








> Being *receptive* is not being open minded, you
> ****ing idiot; it's being partisan.
>
>
> >>>If born liars exist
> >>
> >>lesley is one.
> >
> >
> > No. Ispe Dixit knows her well and told me ages ago that she's a reliable
> > expert on nutrition and alternative animal-friendly treatments.
>
> Derek was incorrect about that
>
>
> >>>>>> "zero point field" (GUFFAW!)
> >>>>>> "veganism"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I've been vegan for over two years now and doing great by it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> "inner earth beings"
> >>>>>> "hollow earth"
> >>>>>> that goofy patent for a MANUFACTURED globe
> >>>>>> helium-inflated number(s) for feed:beef
> >>>>>> rain forest destruction
> >>>>>> Brazil's exports (based on *Argentina's* trade)
> >>>>>> Stolen French flying saucer
> >>>>>> Zapper
> >>>>>> Foot massage (as cure-all)
> >>>>>> Astrology
> >>>>>> Numerology
> >>>>>> Alien abduction
> >>>>>> bestiality
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I very much doubt that.
> >>>>
> >>>>I thought you were open minded?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>You can doubt things while being open-minded about them.
> >>
> >>You're not being honestly open-minded about it.
> >>
> >
> > Yes I am,
>
> No, you aren't.
>
> Her endorsement of it was correctly inferred from her
> failure to state her opposition to it following her
> statement of support for someone (Karen Winter) who
> openly endorses it. lesley was asked repeatedly if she
> wanted to distance herself from Karen on at least that
> one issue, and she refused to do so. That is implicit
> support for it.
>
>
> >>>>>> Leprechauns
> >>>>>> Channeling
> >>>>>> Polar fountains
> >>>>>> Sun gazing
> >>>>>> Chemtrails
> >>>>>> AIDS and ebola conspiracy theory
> >>>>>> Crop circles
> >>>>>> sexually aroused by violent ex-convicts
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Yeah right.
> >>>>
> >>>>She was married to a ****ing British skinhead, you idiot! The guy was an
> >>>>ex-convict. He was a skinhead when she hooked up with him. That's *why* she got
> >>>>together with him: she was aroused by it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>You can't possibly know all that. Soryy, but I don't believe you.
> >>
> >>I do know all of it.
> >
> >
> > Then you should be quiet and stop all your nonsense.
> >
> > cut
>
> Why did you cut, you chickenshit closed-minded ****wit?
>
> <restore>
>
> She went out of town, and he got into her computer and
> started posting, right here in this newsgroup - a lot
> of wild, violence-tinged stuff. He found and began
> posting in some skinhead-oriented groups as well. Here
> is his post: http://tinyurl.com/p6lp8. He was using
> her computer and her pseudonym at that time, "lilweed".
>
> </restore>
>
> Leave it in shitbag. Leave it in as a testament to
> your closed-mindedness.
>
> >>>>As for all the rest, they're all weird beliefs that fly in the face of logic and
> >>>>common sense and science, and that's *why* you believe in them.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I see the emphasis you put on 'why', and I disagree with those
> >>>reasons. I'm not a vegan just because it flies in the face of
> >>>common sense.
> >>
> >>You're a "vegan" (quotes of derision) because it feeds your need to be "different".
> >
> >
> > No, it's a consequence of the principles I hold regarding the treatment
> > of animals.
>
> No, it's based on your wish to try to be distinctive,
> to be "different".
>
>
> >> You're an unaccomplished nobody loser,
> >
> >
> > Enough of the insults.
>
> No. You are asking for them.
>
>
> >> and you're one among millions. Your ego
> >>needs something to make you feel "special", so you went out and found something.
>
> "veganism" is not a thought-out position. It's a
> choice people make *SELF-CONSCIOUSLY* to try to create
> a persona.