****wit David Harrison, cracker, lied:

> On 17 Mar 2006 Leif Erikson wrote:
>
>
>>****wit David Harrison, cracker, lied:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 Leif Erikson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>****wit David Harrison, cracker, lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 14 Mar Leif Erikson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>****wit David Harrison, cracker, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 11 Mar 2006 03:25:47 -0800, wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>I'm the editor at Philosophy Forge ( http://philosophy.answerz.be ),
>>>>>>>>and I'm trying to get a rough idea of the correlations between animal
>>>>>>>>rights and religion. So I have a few questions I hope you don't mind
>>>>>>>>me asking:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(1) Can you give an entirely rational explanation for why killing other
>>>>>>>>animals is wrong?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! They can say what the wrongness is, but not *why* it's
>>>>>>>wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They can certainly give a better explanation of why they think it's
>>>>>>wrong than
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Than nothing
>>>>
>>>>No. They can give a much better explanation of why
>>>>they think it's wrong than *you* can give of why you
>>>>think it's wrong to "prevent animals from 'getting to
>>>>experience life'", ****wit. You can't give *ANY*
>>>>explanation for your belief that makes any sense.
>>>
>>> Than nothing
>>
>>No. They can give a much better explanation of why
>>they think it's wrong than *you* can give of why you
>>think it's wrong to "prevent animals from 'getting to
>>experience life'", ****wit. You can't give *ANY*
>>explanation for your belief that makes any sense.
>>
>>You are beaten
>
>
> you can not even try

You are beaten, Goo ****wit.

They can give a much better explanation of why
they think it's wrong than *you* can give of why you
think it's wrong to "prevent animals from 'getting to
experience life'", ****wit. You can't give *ANY*
explanation for your belief that makes any sense.