Ma���������������� ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿ ½ï¿½ wrote:
> good proving a regular soda served by mistake harmed you enough to
> cause damage and entitle you to compensation. if I get wind of where
> it makes trial, I speak on behalf of the waitress.

He didn't say he intended to sue. If he did, it would be a frivolous
lawsuit. But to take his question at face value, the answer is yes.

If you SPECIFY that something harmful to you be omitted
AND they give it to you anyway,
AND it harms you,
THEN they are liable. (But of course you do have to be able
to prove all three of those elements.)

--
Wes Groleau

Guidelines for judging others:

1. Don't attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by stupidity.

2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which
can be adequately explained by ignorance.

3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which
can be adequately explained by misunderstanding.