View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
dh@.
 
Posts: n/a
Default does anyone else identify with this?

On 18 Jan 2006 17:10:44 -0800, "Leif's Smarter Brother" > wrote:

>
>dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:42:59 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> ><dh@.> wrote
>> >> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:30:18 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>><dh@.> wrote
>> >>>> On 15 Jan 2006 15:55:57 -0800, "Dave" > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>>Presumably the poster you are replying to would not eat the
>> >>>>>products on those grounds.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Maybe. It's more certain that he/she would not eat products
>> >>>> in order to deliberately contribute to decent lives for animals
>> >>>> raised to eat.
>> >>>
>> >>>I would hope not. Nobody in their right mind thinks like that.
>> >>
>> >> Some of us do, which is why we buy cage free eggs, and
>> >> why growers can profit from making them available.
>> >
>> >Stop playing games ****wit. People choose to eat free range *instead of*
>> >conventionally-produced products because they prefer to support better
>> >animal welfare, not because they support animals "getting to experience
>> >life". Nobody in their right mind thinks it's better to eat a free-range egg
>> >and support a hen "getting to experience life" than to not eat an egg at
>> >all.

>>
>> You just aren't really in favor of decent AW, which I've known for
>> years. If you were, you would be in favor of people supporting it even
>> if they never eat an egg at all. You consistently leave me nothing to
>> believe except that you must be an "ara", because even after all of
>> your obvious stupidity I still can't believe you're as stupid as you act.

>
>
>
>Believe it brother. It be sad but it also be true.


Maybe you're right man. I didn't want to believe it, and still find it very hard,
but maybe... In his case it's beyond sad though. If he's what he pretends to
be, it's truly a wonder that he can use the Internet at all, imo.