****wit David Harrison lied:
> On 15 Jan 2006 16:26:01 -0800, "Dave" > wrote:
>
> >
> >****wit David Harrison lied:
> >> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:18:20 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >****wit David Harrison lied:
> >> >> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:20:18 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>****wit David Harrison lied:
> >> >>>> I challenge any/all of you to explain why we should not give
> >> >>>> livestock lives as much consideration as their deaths
> >> >>>
> >> >>>We do give their lives consideration [it's called animal welfare]
> >> >>
> >> >> Then I'm free to encourage people to do so, even though
> >> >> you have been maniacally opposing the suggestion for years.
> >> >
> >> >I've never opposed you advocating animal welfare,
> >>
> >> You do it every time you oppose me,
> >
> >He doesn't
>
> He always does, and I know it.

He NEVER does, and you know it, ****wit.


>
> >and you know it.
> >
> >> and you do it ESPECIALLY
> >> when you lie about it having no consideration for quality of life.
> >>
> >> >I oppose your
> >> >"considering" that because some livestock animals you eat may have lived
> >> >acceptable lives that you are entitled to feel pride that
> >>
> >> *IF!* (retard)
> >>
> >> >they
> >>
> >> Had a life which was a positive experience.
> >
> >The ground nesting birds that were destroyed harvesting your grain
> >probably had lives that were a positive experience. Should they
> >also thank you for eating the grain?
>
> They were not deliberately provided with life as livestock are.

Indirectly, ****wit, they were. The decision to grow the grain was
deliberate, and that "caused" the birds to nest there and have their
broods.

As usual, stupid ****wit, you're evading the real question: WHY are
you so obsessed with livestock, in particular, continuing to exist?
Why do you think we can't see that you are concerned with YOUR welfare,
not theirs? We DO see it, ****wit. You don't fool anyone, not even
your own stupid shitty self.