On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:59:47 GMT, "rick" > wrote:
>"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:40:09 GMT, "rick" > wrote:
>>>"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>>>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:03:12 GMT, "rick" > wrote:
>>>>>"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:29:29 GMT, "rick" > wrote:
>>>>>>>"Derek" > wrote in message ...
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:32:52 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>"Derek" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Perfect Solution Fallacy.
>>>>>>>>>> The perfect solution fallacy is a logical fallacy that
>>>>>>>>>> occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect
>>>>>>>>>> solution exists and/or that a solution should be
>>>>>>>>>> rejected because some part of the problem would
>>>>>>>>>> still exist after it was implemented. Presumably,
>>>>>>>>>> assuming no solution is perfect then no solution
>>>>>>>>>> would last very long politically once it had been
>>>>>>>>>> implemented. Still, many people (notably utopians)
>>>>>>>>>> seem to find the idea of a perfect solution compelling,
>>>>>>>>>> perhaps because it is easy to imagine.
>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_solution_fallacy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Read it and find that you've been wasting your time
>>>>>>>>>> on the collateral deaths issue for years, I'm glad to
>>>>>>>>>> say.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Har har
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's no getting away from it; the collateral deaths
>>>>>>>> argument against veganism is a fallacy.
>>>>>>>==========================
>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO What a hoot!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get used to it, Etter, however hard it must be for someone
>>>>>> like you to accept. You have no choice but to accept the
>>>>>> fact that the collateral deaths argument is specious in
>>>>>> that it poses a false dilemma.
>>>>>===========================
>>>>>LOL The problem for you is that you cannot accept the fact
>>>>>that you kill animals for nothing more than your convenience
>>>>>and entertainment. There is no meaning to your veganism,
>>>>>killer.
>>>>
>>>> Once again you have fallen for the perfect solution fallacy
>>>> by rejecting *my* veganism on the basis that, despite *my*
>>>> implementation of veganism as a solution to animal deaths,
>>>> animal deaths still occur in a World where animal deaths
>>>> cannot be avoided in food production generally. In short,
>>>> you're posing a false dilemma as described above. Thanks
>>>> for lending yourself so willingly in such a clear
>>>> demonstration.
>>>===========
>>>No
>>
>> Yes, you stupid imbecile, you've tried posing exactly the
>> same false dilemma that you always do, and I reject it on
>> the basis that it invokes a fallacy. You lose, you dirty little
>> liar.
>===========
>No

Repeating you denial at this stage after being shown this
false dilemma you pose is absurd, but then you deny the
facts to everything that ruins your trolling here, so it isn't
as absurd as I first believed. I reject your argument on
the basis that it poses a false dilemma, and I've given you
examples analogous to your collateral deaths argument to
show that you are posing a sub fallacy of the false dilemma
known as 'the perfect solution fallacy.' You and your false
dilemma are old news now.