View Single Post
  #63 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.rights.promotion
rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default The collateral deaths argument and the 'Perfect Solution Fallacy": a false dilemma.


"Derek" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:04:32 GMT, "rick" > wrote:
>>"Derek" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>
>>> No. If you want to support your claims, YOU do your own
>>> research and then bring me the results. The onus is on you
>>> to support your claims, not me, so get busy.

>>=========================
>>ROTFLMAO Right after you, killer!!

>
> Rather, after you.

============
You have NEVER provided proof of any of your claims fool. Thanks
for again displaying your hypocricy and stupidity!


While cranking on at the vegans as
> being hypocrites and liars for allegedly ignoring or refusing
> to acknowledge the collateral deaths associated with the
> production of every morsel of food they eat, the production
> of electricity they take advantage of when using Usenet, and
> for the production of just about every consumable item you
> can think of, why do you refuse to acknowledge that the
> production of the beef you claim to eat causes collateral
> deaths?
>
> "The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period."
>
> and
>
> "The production of the beef I eat causes no CDs."
> rick etter Nov 15 2003 http://tinyurl.com/cpdy7
>
> You're the only ****wit on these forums who still refuses
> to acknowledge the collateral deaths associated with the
> production of a food item, yet you're always the first to
> criticise vegans for allegedly refusing to acknowledge
> the collateral deaths associated with the food items they
> eat, even after they've declared that they acknowledge
> them. You're a rank hypocrite and a liar, Rick.