Dreck blew more platitude-filled hot air:
>>>>>No, you can't beat foraging for wild vegetables and fruits.
>>>>
>>>>=====================
>>>>You don't do that do you, fool!
>>>
>>>Nevertheless, your grass fed beef or hunted meat cannot best
>>>forging for wild vegetables and fruits. Whether I forage or not
>>>is irrelevant.
>>
>>===========================
>>LOL Thanks for admitting you are wrong
>
> No, I've shown that I'm right by offering a better solution

Non sequitur: you're not right because of a solution. Your claim that
you're offering a "better" solution is also a logical fallacy.

You might have a case of establishing your virtue if you were to
*PRACTICE* what you preach; I'm not convinced, though, that you'd be
better because you eat some things and refuse to eat other things. All
you're doing now is showing what a shit-stirring windbag you really are
by promoting ideals you never intend to follow yourself. It's just a
specious platitude.

Veganism is the product of clueless Utopian urbanites who, almost as a
rule, *don't* forage and, worse with respect to their disingenuous
platitudes, really don't care that they're causing animals to die via
their consumption of commercially-grown foods. They only care that they
don't violate the rule of not eating animal parts. They extend this rule
to include things that *might* have animal parts, such as the
ingredients found on lists like this:
http://www.veganwolf.com/animal_ingredients.htm