"RobDar" > wrote in message
...
> issue of cd's? not sure I am following....
================
Collateral deaths. Vegetables are full of them. Millions upon
millions upon millions of animals die in crop production. Vegans
never seem to look at that issue. In this case, I would say that
overall the hunter family was causing fewer animal deaths for
their diets than the fruitcake vegan loons. One deer could feed
the family many meals for that one death. All vegans seem to
have is a simple rule for their simple minds, 'eat no meat.'
They never take into account the death and suffering that takes
place for their foods, and so they never compare any of their
foods to each other.




> "Dutch" > wrote in message
> news:fjgef.509881$tl2.224390@pd7tw3no...
>> "Beach Runner" > wrote
>>
>>> A typical US post, taking one example and making every VEG*N
>>> one behavior. How prejudicial and bigoted.
>>
>> The family had to be typical of raw-food vegan/ ARAs.
>>
>>> Obviously the producers sought extremists to make the sure
>>> more interesting.
>>
>> The other family were extreme also, hunting every day and
>> eating mostly meat.
>>
>> The vegan family shopped at a local market, imported nuts,
>> fruit, vegetables, seeds, etc.. while the hunters got most of
>> their food from the local woods. The issue of cds never came
>> up, but I am quite sure that once the hidden collateral cost
>> in animal death and suffering was tallied up, the hunter
>> family would fare quite well by comparison.
>>
>>
>
>