View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,sci.crypt
dh@.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Life can have positive value

On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:05:09 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
><dh@.> wrote in message news
>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100, Francois Grieu >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>In article >, "Dutch" >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> What??? YOU use the concept in all your arguments then want ME
>>>> to define it?
>>>> The onus is on YOU to define what you mean by it.
>>>
>>>Please do NOT include sci.crypt (group on cryptography) in this thread.
>>>
>>>It looks like this whole thing was started by a troll, which main
>>>motive appears to be to be to spam the group sci.crypt.
>>>
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>
>>> Francois Grieu

>>
>> Someone in that group possibly thought that someone else in that
>> group might have something to contribute that's worth thinking about,
>> regarding whether or not life can have positive value.

>
>These fishing expeditions of yours into unrelated groups are rude,
>inappropriate, and never result in gaining you any support for your
>boneheaded ideas.

I didn't include the lame sci.crypt group:

From:
Message-ID: >
Followup-To: sci.crypt
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:17:33 GMT

That's how it got involved. But just as you who amusingly/IGNORANTLY!
pasted the quote: "The method of husbandry determines whether or not the
life has positive or negative value to the animal" don't have any clue how
live could have positive value to animals regardless of quality, obviously no
one in sci.crypt has anything worth thinking about it either.