On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:16:46 GMT, Ward Abbott >
wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:14:18 -0700, sf >
>wrote:
>
>>That's just plain mean. She asked an honest question and prefaced it
>>with the reason why she needs to ask it.
>
>SHE OPENED the door and asked the question. Moral of the
>story....never ask a question that you don't want to hear the answer
>to. Yes...the truth can be painful at times.

You were replying to her posting style, not the query. This is, after
all, a cooking newsgroup, and questions about cooking are part of this
community's posts. You replied, quite unpleasantly:

> Were you expecting a random Usenet reader to interpret your ineptness?

Yes, up to a point, she *was* "expecting a random Usenet reader" to
reply to her question about accidental over-salting, which I believe
we all have done at one time or another, and has nothing to do with
"ineptness" and everything to do with inattention or carelessness.
>
>Take an honest look at the subject line....just endless blather when a
>four word subject line would be more appropriate.

You are complaining about a *header*??? So what? You really need to
up your meds if this is the sort of thing that aggravates you, aulde
son.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"