Dutch wrote:
> > Really? so you'd lock a cat in jail for eating a mouse? man you are
> > weird.
>
> No, that's not what I mean. I mean, for example, that a domestic animal has
> a right to be fed and sheltered and protected from abuse.

Oh really, so where do you draw the line? Surely *death* is the
ultimate *abuse*!!

eg Framer Brown raises cattle, sheep, poultry, fish for the purpose of
human consumption? ie for humans to eat.

What happens to your so called *rights of animals* when it comes time
for the farmer to sell his stock to be slaughtered?

ie I am asking you to define the difference between your *animal
rights* and the rights of humans? why not let humans be killed for
other humans to eat as well?


Michael Gordge