"Derek" > wrote in message
...
> On 23 Sep 2005 08:18:55 -0700, "Sleepyhead" > wrote:
>
>>Hmm. Well if those posts are anything to go by it seems I've misjudged
>>you ... serves me right for butting-in I guess!
>>
>>So basically what you're saying is that at the very least Dutch is
>>confused, at worst he's deliberately adopting stances to suit his
>>audience. Well can't say I disapprove terribly - I'm a bugger for
>>changing my mind too - but I can see why you'd get fed-up conversing
>>with someone like that if you were after a long-running and detailed
>>set of arguments about animal-rights et al.
>
> Exactly, Simon. That's my only gripe. If he at last rests
> on one side of the debate instead of changing it when
> asked to explain his current position, I wouldn't mind
> at all, but as things stand I can never get him to commit,
> and all the while while this goes on he attacks the arguer
> promoting that which he can't commit to, and that's very
> frustrating after five years if in fact you're genuine about
> that proposition and would like to argue it honestly.

You're a dirty liar and a game player Derek, you know exactly where I stand.
You deliberately consconstrue and misrepresent people's positions to further
your own interests, whatever they are.