Derek wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:16:53 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>>Derek wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:54:07 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:20:10 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 8 Sep 2005 16:42:39 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 8 Sep 2005 12:43:27 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:37:59 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Beef sold as "grass-fed" is, indeed, 100% grass-fed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Not according to evidence from U.S.D.A.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yes, according to all evidence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>U.S.D.A. have issued a marketing claims standard
>>>>>>>>>proposal which
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>...has now been withdrawn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's a desperate lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>>It IS a lie,
>>>>
>>>>It's not a lie.
>>>
>>> <restore>
>>>It IS a lie,
>>
>>It is not a lie.
>
>
> <restore>
> It IS a lie,

It is not a lie. The proposed standard is being
rewritten, and again will be subject to public comment.