View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Allan Matthews
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8 Sep 2005 07:30:36 -0700, "Sheldon" > wrote:

>
>Allan Matthews wrote:
>> On 8 Sep 2005 05:44:53 -0700, "Sheldon" > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Allan Matthews wrote:
>> >> Sheldon
>> >> It would be interesting to see how the NOLA situation would have gone if you were > in charge.
>> >
>> >Would/ve been no stinkin' situation... my first day in office I'd have
>> >condemned the entire city, bulldozed it flat and let Mother Nature take
>> >it from there... should have been condemned 100 years ago. And that's
>> >what needs to be done now. The residents are so friken stupid and they
>> >thump their bibles way too much... those pinheads actually look to the
>> >government like it's Moses, with one wave of a stick their Red Sea
>> >would part. duh
>> >
>> >To be perfectly honest, from what I've seen on T-Vee, it'd be no great
>> >human loss had all of those who *refused* to leave drowned. At this
>> >point I'd not permit them to leave, let them continue to rot... can't
>> >imagine any viable city would want that no account welfare dreck. Now
>> >I see the powers that be gonna give those total losers even more
>> >welfare, in the form of debit cards, like those zombies are going to
>> >all of a sudden know how to manage cash... most of them will blow it on
>> >crack.
>> >
>> >Instead of wasting resources (mine) pumping water they need to finish
>> >what Mother Nature started and bulldoze all those levees before she
>> >returns, and she definitely will... this was only a very mild warning.
>> >
>> > You are a truly compassionate soul, Sheldon.

>
>Compassion (feeling badly) is a negative emotion (drags one down to the
>level of the inept), what purpose in crying into ones beer, most
>especially wasted on the able bodied who REFUSE to care for
>themselves... why would any responsible person want to invest in
>someone who'd rather drown. Compassion is reserved for the
>infirm/elderly, infants and most especially animals.... where's the
>compassion of rescue squads who made no provision for and refuse to
>save the most vulnerable and innocent, the animals. Allan, you're the
>one whose priorties are skewed and befuddled. My priorities are in
>order and well defined... *help those first who are most willing to
>help themselves*. You're the kind of pinhead who'd waste energy
>wanting to blow breath into a leaking balloon.... you want to pour MY
>resourses into the parasites, well you go right ahead, but with YOUR
>resources, and then quit yer bitchin when they kick you in your crotch.
> I got your compassion schwingin'... I'd sooner rescue a potted plant
>before some no account section 8 welfare dreck... at least with care
>the plant will flourish, the dreck will always remain dreck and the
>more they're given the more they'll take and never give anything back.
>
>
>Sheldon


You are going under the assumption that all of these people who have
lost everything there are "bad" people, leeches on society, and not
worth helping. You are a pathetic person. I feel sorry for you.
Have a good day and really try to enjoy life.
Allan