Thread: N3w
View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)   Report Post  
Scented Nectar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Too much snipping and running.
Try again

--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. .
> Skanky wrote:
> >>>>Claire's self-crippled and morbidly obese Uncle Dreck wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>I've not turned down meals prepared for me by family
> >>>>>>>>>>members or my friends just because they use foods I
> >>>>>>>>>>normally don't.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>You DO turn down such meals
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>No, I don't refuse anything.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You TURNED THEM DOWN,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>No
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Your
> >>>>
> >>>>No, fatso, I don't refuse anything. I gratefully accepted the rum cake

> >
> > Fatso?

>
> Yes, he's morbidly obese.
>
> > I'm detecting a fear

>
> Then try getting out in a crowd and overcoming it, dummy.
>
> >>>>and shared it with friends and family who like that kind of thing. As
> >>>>far as my brother goes, the issue was framed with "IF." He knows I
> >>>>wouldn't eat it, so he won't even offer it. We respect each other that
> >>>>way, something which appears to be foreign in your Jerry

Springer-esque
> >>>>dysfunctional family. I find it amusing that you object more to

sharing
> >>>>a rum cake than sharing your wife with your own twin brother. Did you
> >>>>hear David's belly slapping against Belinda's? Why do you object to
> >>>>sharing rum cake but not to other blokes -- much less your own brother
> >>>>-- shagging your wife?
> >>>
> >>>You snipped the evidence
> >>
> >>That wasn't evidence. I admit I shared the rum cake with family and
> >>friends. The real question is, What would Dreck do if someone were to
> >>offer him the same cake? Bear in mind he's such a twit that he shunned
> >>black olives because he was misinformed about the brine in which they're
> >>cured.

> >
> > What would you do

>
> It wouldn't happen.
>
> >> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but
> >> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or
> >> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to
> >> maintain my ethical standard.
> >> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3
> >>
> >>Would his "ethical standard" preclude him from eating a cake which
> >>contained eggs and other ingredients of animal origin, or just olives
> >>which he ignorantly believes "swim around in squid ink"? Would his
> >>sanctimonious ethics preclude him from giving that cake to people whose
> >>morals were a little looser than his own (like, maybe, his brother and
> >>wife)?

> >
> > You seem awfully preoccupied with
> > Derek's brother and wife, and their
> > alleged affair.

>
> It wasn't alleged. David mentioned it (http://tinyurl.com/n292) and
> Dreck has confirmed it.
>
> >>>You seem to have a preoccupation with fatness.
> >>
> >>It's not a preoccupation. Dreck has been kind enough to admit his weight
> >>and even to post pictures of him sleeping with his dog (nothing untoward
> >>shown in the pics or intended in my remarks). He further has admitted to
> >>his insatiety when eating. As a result of his gluttony and lack of
> >>exercise, he's become one of the world's fattest vegans. He's evidence
> >>that veganism isn't inherently healthier than any other diet, only that
> >>it comes with a lot of hollow sanctimony. I like to point to him when
> >>people talk about how veganism is healthier or that vegans are slim and
> >>trim. Vegans who don't over-eat may be, but so, too, are those
> >>non-vegans who are sensible in diet and exercise.

> >
> > I still think

>
> No, you never have. Your drug-addled mind is incapable of thought.