usual suspect wrote:

> Beach Runner wrote:
>
>>>> US cross posted so my response went to the same three. That is valid.
>>>>
>>>> He doesn't see that posting from a group paid for by car
>>>> manufactures on fuel efficiency is a conflict of interest.
>>>
>>>
>>> The issue then was whether or not one car maker should join a group
>>> of other car makers, per the retarded petition you posted. The
>>> petition said the other maker shouldn't and then gave reasons which
>>> had no basis in reality. That group doesn't advocate a return to big
>>> cars from the 1970s. It doesn't advocate any kind of car. It
>>> advocates consumer choice -- something you Marxists find very
>>> objectionable.
>>
>>
>> Car companies are advocating profit.
>
>
> What company doesn't try to profit, Bob? And why do you object that one
> car manufacturer may align itself with other manufacturers?


That's why you have government regulations and consumer groups, to
protect the public. That also levels the field so all the companies
will make fuel efficient, cleaner cars, something our environment needs.