Beach Runner wrote:
>>> US cross posted so my response went to the same three. That is valid.
>>>
>>> He doesn't see that posting from a group paid for by car manufactures
>>> on fuel efficiency is a conflict of interest.
>>
>> The issue then was whether or not one car maker should join a group of
>> other car makers, per the retarded petition you posted. The petition
>> said the other maker shouldn't and then gave reasons which had no
>> basis in reality. That group doesn't advocate a return to big cars
>> from the 1970s. It doesn't advocate any kind of car. It advocates
>> consumer choice -- something you Marxists find very objectionable.
>
> Car companies are advocating profit.

What company doesn't try to profit, Bob? And why do you object that one
car manufacturer may align itself with other manufacturers?