usual suspect wrote:
> Beach Runner wrote:
>
>> US cross posted so my response went to the same three. That is valid.
>>
>> He doesn't see that posting from a group paid for by car manufactures
>> on fuel efficiency is a conflict of interest.
>
>
> The issue then was whether or not one car maker should join a group of
> other car makers, per the retarded petition you posted. The petition
> said the other maker shouldn't and then gave reasons which had no basis
> in reality. That group doesn't advocate a return to big cars from the
> 1970s. It doesn't advocate any kind of car. It advocates consumer choice
> -- something you Marxists find very objectionable.
Car companies are advocating profit.