Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
Beach Runner
 
Posts: n/a
Default



usual suspect wrote:
> Beach Runner wrote:
>
>> Even if the few scientists, most of which are subsidized by groups

>
>
> Ipse dixit and unproven. I showed you, dumb ass, that scientists are
> EVENLY DIVIDED on the notion of global warming being a result of human
> activities. What part of EVENLY DIVIDED do you not comprehend?
>
>> ...the very real number of independent scientists warn we must
>> take strong action. That's Marxist?

>
>
> Yes -- and you're both overestimating the number of scientists who
> believe humans are responsible for global warming and overstating the
> number of those who "warn we must take strong action." Scientists are
> evenly divided on whether humans have even caused a problem. The number
> of scientists who believe we should make radical change is a percentage
> of those who believe it's a human problem -- or a smaller percentage of
> all scientists.
>
> The fact remains: this is an issue at which you leftists want to take
> radical *POLITICAL* action before clear *SCIENTIFIC* assessments are
> made. You leftist nutjobs want to replace FREE ENTERPRISE with your
> pathetic version of a Marxist Utopia. You would eliminate freedom for
> what YOU (and YOU ALONE) call "the greater good."
>
>> Hardly.

>
>
> You ARE a Marxist. You're an authoritarian leftist.
>
>> We stand a strong change of terrible consequences.

>
>
> Strong chance? That's entirely UNPROVEN. There are many data which
> contradict your claims of cataclysm. I just disagree with your position
> that we need to act before knowing (a) IF there is really a problem --
> and remember, scientists are EVENLY SPLIT on the issue of whether human
> activity is to blame for global warming -- and (b) the extent to which
> human activity plays a role in global warming or the extent to which
> changing our behavior will reverse global warming. You have predictions,
> prophecy. I demand SCIENCE before I'll consent that there's a problem or
> that altering my behavior will have any affect on it. Until science has
> clear answers, go **** yourself.
>
>> Many independent scientists,

>
>
> About half of them, and the other half disagrees with them.
>
>> MIT, NOA, NASA all agree on Global warming.

>
>
> NOAA. They do not all agree, nor do all their scientists.


As a statement they do.
>
> http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=901
>
>> You pull a site funded by Mitsubishi

>
>
> No, funded by a cross-section of car makers.
>


With a Mittsubishi emblem. They are the car makers. Hardly free minded.
>> and say big deal.

>
>
> I say "big deal" on the basis of what a variety of sources have to say
> about the issue.
>
> http://www.marshall.org/article.php?id=67
> http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=887
> http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=851
>
> Etc.
>
>> Insult me some more

>
>
> Sure. Scatterbrains. Dipshit. ****. Asshole. Is that better?
>
>
>>>>>> We may need to sacrifice some performance for the greater good.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a Marxist authoritarian zealot who has the audacity to say
>>>>> Ben Franklin would be on your side. **** you and your version of
>>>>> the greater good -- notions which our Founders would've strenuously
>>>>> objected and resisted to their deaths, just as I shall. You make
>>>>> your own sacrifices. I refuse to sacrifice for your good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Many sites predict horrendous consequences. And you won't even consider
them. You're closed minded.

You're more influenced by groups funded by special interests. That's
stupid. Chose INDEPENDENT groups.



>>>>
>>>> I'm not a Marxist,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You're a Marxist and a liar.
>>>
>>>> MANY believe we must take strong action
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Logical fallacy of appealing to popularity.
>>> http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/pop.htm
>>>
>>>> I make a few typos. Insult me for it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gladly. Dickhead. Moron. Loser. ****. Happy now?



Marx know knothing about global warming. In fact, the former Communist
nations have horrendous polutions. But still the US produces the most
greenhouse gasses.

An anology is wrong.