See

http://solar-center.stanford.edu/sun...glob-warm.html

Is global warming man made. From the hippies at Stanford.

Here are two that disagree
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-gwn081203.php


Beach Runner wrote:
> I admit, he may have replied.
> But the Republican Governor of Alaska is saying this quick increase in
> temperature is devastating. He ignores such comments. And points to the
> world "dispute". Name a group of independent scientists that don't say
> we are accelerating global greenhouse effect.
>
> There is one I can point to. Michael Chritner (sp). Not really a
> scientist.
>
> Most of the ones are on Bush's payroll.
>
> When I pointed out that his cabinet member quit over the deregulation's
> of environmental laws, his statement was she was a liberal. Maybe I
> missed a reply with substance, and concede that possibility but I doubt it.
>
> Global Warming is a disaster that Glinton and Gore were working on. Bush
> reversed all their work to protect the oil industry. We should be
> preparing for a new kind of future. Based on trains, centralized
> resources and energy passive buildings.
>
> Hybrid technology does not meet the objects already in place that Bush
> canceled.
>
> Hybrids could be very fuel efficient. The Prious demonstrated that.
> It would mean American's would be forced to give up some performance and
> space. That's called reality.
>
> He declared the Iraq war over. In fact the insurgency grows. We were
> originally told the troops would be home in a few months.
>
> What's his answer to the governor to the state of Alaska? Alaska is in
> big trouble. Houses are collapsing as the temperature rose 8 degrees in
> a short period. This is far to fast a change to compare to the "ice age".
>
> Or the vast independent majority of scientists that predict global
> warming? That Bush questions it?
>
> It requires strong action now.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm against terrorism, yet Bush continues placating
> the Saudis because they have oil. How about wind and solar energy
> rebates? Why won't he do that? Because he's in the oil business as are
> his friends.
>
> I documented several models that show Britain will freeze when polar
> caps melt. He was unaware of such a possibility. He should thank me
> for bringing them to his attention. If he did, with my news reader, I
> apologize.
>
>
> The fact is the US contributes far more than it's share of greenhouse
> gasses. Shy did he cancel the great legislature that Clinton and Gore
> had in effect. If they were in effect maybe Detroit's cars could
> compete, and Detroit auto company's bonds wouldn't be junk status.
>
> If he chooses to have a meaningful, NON INSULTING discussion we can do
> it. Usually his answers attack the person, as he has repeatedly called
> me stupid. Objective data prove otherwise.
>
>
> He calls "Change Agents" radicals. Carl Sagon was a change agent. A
> brilliant scientist he called for change regarding energy, the use of
> natural resources, and seeing the world as one.
>
> Bush wants to change social security in such a way as to put money in
> the hands of businesses. That's being a change agent. The arguments
> are worth examining. The risk is very real. Is Bush a radical since
> he's a change agent?
>
>
>
> Bob