Yeah, the sites that try to be fancy are quite irritating. Some folks turn
off their browser's Javascript for a reason - like it's a favored method for
abusive practices like popups.

I run my browser through a local proxy called Privoxy (freeware) that allows
me to pick and choose what gets through, and which sites are exceptions to
the rules. I don't know how others suffer without it...

Domori's site works for me, but it is indeed in the category of "impress
everyone with the fancy, flashy graphics". Give me a static page any day...

"Alex Rast" > wrote in message
...
> at Sun, 02 May 2004 07:48:35 GMT in >,
> (Blake Jones) wrote :
> OK, a mystery solved! I never did see anything other than a picture if I
> click on "All Chocolate". I just assumed, for many months, that Domori's
> site was either a work in progress or relatively sparse. But now it's
clear
> that this is yet another manifestation of an irritating Web navigation
> problem I've got. Most sites with JavaScript pulldowns, I can't access.
> (Whine: why is it that so many sites are giving no option but to use a
> JavaScript pulldown menu to navigate their site? My problem, as it turns
> out, is highly technical (i.e. not a browser incompatibility), but can't
> more Web site designers be sensitive to the fact that there *are* other
> users out there with incompatible browsers, for whom the simple inclusion
> of a text menu as an alternate navigation method would end user
> frustration, and give their site more hits, as well as more business to
> their company?) Domori's site is perverse because I can navigate certain
> parts, leading to the impression that nothing's wrong, but obviously,
> there's a lot of invisible stuff.