View Single Post
  #62 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


rick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> >i am referring to rick and Dutch here. Their by the book attacks
> >and
> > hollow ruminations seem at best spineless, pointless and soft.

> =====================
> Really? Then refute anything we've said, killer. If you want
> by-the-book recitations then the web-site posted isthe perfect
> example, fool. It's a mish-mash of lys told over and over by the
> wannabe vegan brain-dead.
>


Alright then here is your rather silly refutation. You seem to keep
bringing up a rather pointless idea, namely that certain animals
"might" get killed or displaced due to current farming practices. This
may or may not be true, and you don't cite numbers, and for good
reason.

Even though some of these animal deaths might truly be avoidable, it is
not the same as eating the flesh of an animal killed only to satisfy
some urgent need to eat meat.

You are trying to paint the act of eating brown rice, other grains and
soy products as morbid and cavalier exercises in dietary excess.

You couldn't be more wrong.

Simply stated - i'll pass. You don't seem to have the intellectual
faculties to follow a simple argument, or parse a simple sentence. And
if your dull attacks are any indication your derived and irrelevant
constructions are wholly pointless and spineless, and they are, then
there isn't much to refute.