"Sprang" > wrote in message
...
> In article
> .net>,
> "rick" > wrote:
>
>> >> > That was
>> >> > my first post in these newsgroups, and your reply appears
>> >> > to
>> >> > be
>> >> > one that
>> >> > you could have posted to, well, just about ANY post in
>> >> > either
>> >> > of the
>> >> > newsgroups this thread is in. So what is that?
>> >
>> > Um... you forgot to answer this part. Convenient.
>
> Still forgot to answer this. So what's the deal with jumping me
> like that?
> Troll.
======================
The problem is your question rambles and never really means
anything that I can tell.
So, what's you excuse for not answering questions and then
demanding that others do?


>
>> ===============
>> Hey dishonest snipper, you never tried to discuss what I asked
>> first, how conveninet, eh troll?
>
> I answered it in another part of this thread, as you know.
================
No, I don't...

>
> You are advocating nothing, and are advocating against some
> mysterious
> absolutist who is not participating in this thread.
=====================
Not mysterious at all fool. The site you posted was all about
absolutes. Try reading it.



I am advocating that
> vegetarianism is comparatively better than the status quo for
> most people.
====================
And I'm advocating that selecting the right meats is better than
that. Diference is, I provide data to prove what I post, not
just claims.