Questions wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:08:38 -0500, Dan Logcher
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Questions wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:56:00 -0700, "Ken Blake"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In ,
>>>>Questions > typed:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:41:06 -0500, Dan Logcher
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Questions wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:01:46 -0800, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So why are you posting non-sushi related spam?
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually Dan, I was attempting to let others in the group know
>>>>>that
>>>>>the posting just above mine was SPAM, and didn't need to be
>>>>>opened.
>>>>>This is so obvious, I wonder why you would bother to ask. Are
>>>>>you
>>>>>baiting me or just being funny?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't know what Dan had in mind, but let me point out that when
>>>>you answer a spam message and repost the URL that the spammer
>>>>posted, you are reposting and spreading the spam for him.
>>>>
>>>>If you must do this, at least obliterate the company name, URL,
>>>>etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>So, his answer to me was also "reposting and spreading the spam", as
>>>it also contained the URL that was posted by the spammer?
>>>
>>>Get real guys. I've been using the Internet since the days of UNIX
>>>only. I know what I'm doing. In this case, I was warning of a spam
>>>message and it makes no difference if the damn url was in it or not.
>>>Stop with the nit-picking. I'm sure you are way too old for it.
>>
>>Big deal.. I've been using the Internet before UNIX, when it was called
>>the ARPANET, and it was on PDP-10's and 11's (Tops-20). My point was that
>>you continued the spam, and didn't add any warning except in the Subject.
>
>
> As you did. Your point is invalid. You also have a real attitude.
> Stick to Sushi wiseguy.
I asked why you were posting spam.. cuz to me, it looks like your
sending it along. you think I have an attitude? Heh, haven't been
around some of the less friendly newsgroups then. Don't expect people
to be so helpful if you can't take some constructive criticism.
--
Dan