Skanky the Toronto whore/marginal wrote:
> > > In every instance that I told you that, you were
> > > trying to tell me what I absolutely must believe.
> >
> > That isn't the same as telling you what to believe. It is telling
you
> > where the beliefs you admit to holding necessarily lead. That's
> > something very different.
> >
> > But you, being a defiant teen/marginal and instance of arrested
> > development, kept interpreting it as telling you what to believe.
>
> You were telling me to believe your version of
> absolute musts.
No, I wasn't telling you TO believe anything at all. You really don't
get it.
I was telling you that IF you believed certain things you said you do,
then you MUST also believe certain other things; otherwise, your
beliefs are impossibly inconsistent and thus incoherent and absurd. I
was and still am right about it.
> I don't believe as you do,
What you believe is incomprehensible garbage.
> and you were forcing it on me,
I wasn't "forcing" anything on you.
There it is again: "forced complicity", "forcing", "you're not the
boss of me!" That is defiant-teen/marginal material, Skanky.
> being insanely relentless about it.
Because my analysis is correct.
> So if I tell you to back off
> and you're not the boss of me,
then you're being a defiant teen/marginal, and stupid. It's that
simple.
|