On 1 Feb 2005 14:25:46 -0800, wrote:

>
wrote:
>> On 1 Feb 2005 11:47:32 -0800, wrote:
>>
>> >
>> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 01:21:26 GMT,
>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Non-existent - but NOT imaginary - farm animals for
>> >> >some bizarre reason have some kind of reality
>> >>
>> >> Like what?
>> >>
>> >> >Farm animals that haven't been conceived and born are
>> >> >non-existent but not imaginary.
>> >>
>> >> What a stupid idea. You must be a moron.
>> >
>> >You calling someone else a moron is the ultimate pot, kettle, black
>> >situation. You are, let's remember, the dumbass who has spent years
>> >claiming that life, in and of itself, is a benefit
>>
>> It's the benefit which makes all others possible, yes.
>
>No. The fact that life makes benefits possible does not make life
>itself a benefit.
>>
>> >even though you have
>> >been shown numerous times that this claim contradicts the very
>> >definition of the word "benefit".
>>
>> No, I never have.
>
>Yes you have. You're lying. Of course it was always in English which
>you don't understand.
>
>No one has been able to show that the
>> claim contradicts a respectable definition, and no one will be
>> able to.
>
>You did it yourself below. Again, i's in English so you'll never
>understand it.

LOL!

>> >Of course, it's a definition you
>> >can't and never will be able to comprehend.
>> __________________________________________________ _______
>> BEN'EFIT, n. [Primarily from L. beneficium, or benefactum.]
>> [...]
>> 2. Advantage
>> [...]
>>
>http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster...eb1828=benefit
>>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>> Life is the advantage=benefit which allows zygotes to grow
>> into animals.
>
>No. To support your clai you must show that life is an advantage
>compared to never existing.

Wrong. I only need point out that life is the advantage which
allows zygotes to grow into animals.

>You can't, your whole rant is childish
>bullshit.
>
>
>You must be either another, or the same moron.
>
>Quit talking to yourself.
>
>
>
>> Which is it Gonad? Are you you, or are you some other moron?
>
>You clueless sister-****ing cracker. I called you "Jethro",

LOL! I mean: ooh, aren't you the special little fruit.

>see if
>you can figure it out from that. The racist slimeball Ray already did,

Yes, he said you are Brandumbass. That certainly doesn't mean
you're not the Gonad too though, 'dumbass.

>so you're even more dimwitted than Ray; that's bad Jethro, real bad.
>Now, show that an animal, ANY animal, is better off after it is born
>than before. You've claimed it for years without supporting it, why is
>that?

I've pointed out several times that if the unborn animals are not born,
they will die and so will their mothers. But you're too stupid to understand
even that much Brandumb.