In article et>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote:

> uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
> engagement and wrote:
>
> > In article t>,
> > Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult engagement and
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think it the responsibility of the person who places the crosspost
> >>>there to remove the cross post. That is the reason I don't trim headers.
> >>>They put it there, let them remove it. If they didn't want it there,
> >>>they wouldn't have placed it there.
> >>
> >>This is interesting, Ron. Someone in rec.boats asks to
> >>have his group removed. You COULD do it, easily, but
> >>you choose not to do it. You **** off someone you
> >>don't even know by refusing to acceded to his polite
> >>request. You are now in the position of DIRECTLY doing
> >>something that antagonizes someone, but you disclaim
> >>any responsibility for it.
> >
> >
> > Incorrect. The person who placed the crosspost is the one who wanted it
> > there and is the one who hoped to see some irritation in another.
>
> FOLLOWING the polite request to remove it, Ron, you
> have it within your power to do so. Why do you
> deliberately aggravate the rec.boat readers by not
> removing it, when you've been politely asked to remove it?
>
> You're responsible, Ron.

Why should I do for others what they can do for themselves? Anyone not
wanting the posts in rec.boat can easily trim the header and send it
back and avoid the continuation of the post being viewed in that
newsgroup.