> > We have all the time in the world.
>
> You do. Your time is worth very little.

Little to you, a lot to me. That's why I
only do things that I want on this news
group. Your test isn't one of them.

> Bullshit. *I* did a quick Google and found literally
> HUNDREDS of references.
>
> > I'm not going to spend more time on that.
>
> You didn't spend any.

I did. What were your search criteria? I
likely had wrong ones.

> > You could just simply answer.
>
> I could, but it would be pointless, because your
> refusal to take the quiz has nothing to do with my
> failure to tell you. It ONLY has to do with fear, and
> now stubbornness.
>
> > Are you
> > afraid that revealing the source might
> > discredit the test?
>
> Not in the least.

Well, cough it up then.

> > I'm starting to suspect that you made up
> > this test yourself,
>
> Nope. I wish I could take credit for it, but I can't.

> > Sometimes I'm willing to be part of a
> > statistic taking test.
>
> This test does not gather statistics in any way. It's
> usenet, you idiot. I know that that snarky cocksucker
> Ron explicitly talked about the test being "at a
> website", but he GOT THAT WRONG.

If it does not gather statistics, then what's
it for? You said it would tell whether every
vegan was leftwing like you say. So, would
that not involve getting the statistics through
the test? What else is it for?

> > I question the test's source
> > and validity.
>
> No, you don't. You don't care about its source and
> validity. That's just your time-wasting smokescreen.
> Thanks again for demonstrating you're a liar: the test
> being a waste of time is of no concern to you.

What are you hiding about it's source, or maybe
a better question, why are you hiding it's source?


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.