little HIV+ felcher Ron wrote:
> In article >,
> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > C. James Strutz wrote:
> >
> > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > >
> > >>I presented 2, homesteading and death.
> > >>I forgot about getting a farmer to grow
> > >>veganic for one or more. Both homesteading
> > >>and hiring a farmer are not in most
> > >>people's budget, that leaves only death
> > >>or buying commercial. Have I left
> > >>anything out? (keep in mind that eating
> > >>meat is not an option, nor is it 0 death)
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me ask you a question: what would you do if the only two
options were
> > > eating meat and death? Just curious...
> >
> > She'd eat the meat. I think she's already said that.
> >
> > Homo felcher Ron would just shriek, "False dilemma!
> > False dilemma!" and flounce away.
>
> In the real world, such a dilemma does not exist. Therefore it is a
> false dilemma.

"False dilemma" does not refer to the fact that the dilemma doesn't
exist in the real world. You are again committing a defintional
fallacy.