On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:40:47 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:

[..]
>>>No, I didn't. I wrote
>>>
>>> His analysis is fair enough, and I don't have a problem
>>> with it as far as it goes. What is curious, however,
>>> is that it also links vegetarians to the collateral
>>> deaths caused by the production of the crops they eat.
>>>
>>>"It" in the second sentence refers to "his analysis".

You cannot lie by claiming "it (Matheny's analysis) also
links vegetarians to the collateral deaths caused by the
production of the crops they eat." Only your admitted-to
extension to it allegedly does that.