Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>>Then you have to acknowledge forced complicity
>>>>
>>>>There is no such thing. There is complicity, or there
>>>>isn't.
>>>
>>>
>>>Then forced complicity
>>
>>There is no such thing.
>
>
> Then lets call it forced participation.
No such thing. You CHOOSE to participate in the market
for commercially grown produce.
>
>
>>>I presented 2, homesteading and death.
>>>I forgot about getting a farmer to grow
>>>veganic for one or more. Both homesteading
>>>and hiring a farmer are not in most
>>>people's budget,
>>
>>Claiming not to be able to afford to do the right thing
>>does not exculpate you for doing the wrong thing.
>
>
> Not having the money for something turns
> that something into an impossibility
> choice-wise.
False, but irrelevant: it STILL does not excuse
wrongdoing. If you claim you "need" food, and you have
no money, and you break into a grocery store and steal
some food, you have done wrong, and you are culpable,
both legally and morally.
You always have choices.
|