"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
...
>> > Moral complicity dissappears in the following
>> > situation. The situation of no choice.
>>
>> 1. No, it doesn't. Your complicity in the "bad"
>> outcome doesn't change.
>
> Then you have to acknowledge forced complicity
> as being way less morally wrong than willful
> complicity.
>
>> 2. There IS a choice.
>
> The only other choice (assuming one
> can't afford to homestead) is death
> from starvation.
====================
No fool, you been shown that they are other choices within the foods that
you eat now! You are just to self-absorbed into killing animals
unnecessarily to seriously look at those options. Afterall, your selfish
conveninece and entertainment come first, as you have proven over and over,
killer.



That can't possibly
> be seen as a viable choice! Surely
> you must agree.
>
>
> --
> SN
> http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
> A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
> Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.
>
>
>