Ron wrote:

> In article t>,
> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>>formerly known as 'cat arranger' wrote:
>>
>>>I believe that existence is a benefit.
>>
>>No, it isn't. A benefit is something that makes an
>>entity better off; that is, something that improves the
>>welfare of an entity.
>
>
> What is a "benefit" is also subjective.

Irrelevant, thus non sequitur. It doesn't change the
FACT that an entity MUST ALREADY exist in order to
realize any benefit from anything.

You regularly spew irrelevancies. Why is that?

>
>
>>Prior to existing, the entity DIDN'T HAVE a welfare
>>that could be improved. Thus, initial existence did
>>not improve the entity's welfare, and initial existence
>>therefore CANNOT be a benefit.