> wrote
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:07:43 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>>> just not relevant
>>> to you because you only care about YOU, and don't even have
>>> basic consideration for the animals. Not only do you not have
>>> basic consideration for the animals, but you don't want anyone
>>> else to either.
>>
>>How does your "basic consideration" benefit any animal or person?
>
> It doesn't.

Then why should anyone consider it?

>How does your oppostition to basic consideration benefit
> any animal or person?

It entertains me to shoot down stupid arguments like yours.

>>What is
>>this "basic consideration" that I am withholding from them? How are they
>>harmed by my withholding of it? Does my withholding of this "basic
>>consideration" have ANY effect at all on any animal or any human?
>
> No. And it can't either. But if more people develop such consideration
> then products which promote decent lives for livestock could very well
> become popular, and THAT is exactly what you are really opposed to.

"The Logic of The Larder" will never become popular. It is transparently
self-serving sophistry to anyone with the brain power of a 10 year-old.