View Single Post
  #79 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 Jan 2005 13:58:47 -0800, "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:

>****wit David Harrison wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:39:15 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >****wit David Harrison wrote
>> >> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
>> >
>> >>>EVERYONE, ****wit. Everyone rejects your ****witted "eat meat so
>> >>>animals will live" ****wittery. EVERYONE, ****wit. You lost.
>> >>
>> >> In order for me to lose, something would have to change so that
>> >> animals no longer experience life because humans raise them for
>> >> food, but I would have to believe that they still exist.
>> >
>> >No, in order for you lose it just has to be irrelevant, and it is.

>>
>> Not yet, because they still exist.

>
>Yes,


No.

>NOW. No one is adhering to your ****witted, demented "eat meat so
>animals will exist" crapola. EVERYONE, on both sides, rejects your
>****wittery. Omnivores were already eating meat, and NONE of them eats
>meat in order to "give life" to farm animals. "vegans" STILL aren't
>eating meat, because they see along with everyone else that eating meat
>in order to cause farm animals to exist is NOT conferring any benefit
>on animals.
>
>You LOST, ****wit. Five and a half years you've been trying this
>bullshit, and you LOST utterly: not ONE single convert to your
>****witted cause.
>
>> It is relevant

>
>It is IRRELEVANT.


No.