"Rudy Canoza" > wrote

>>>>because the "future royals" don't exist, so NOTHING exists for "them":
>>>>there's no "them".
>>>
>>>Future royals don't need to exist for their benefits to exist,
>>>as shown, so you ought to think this one through again
>>>like I earlier advised.
>>
>>>>There might NEVER be "them": Great Britain might abolish the monarchy.
>>>
>>>Yet those benefits will still exist on display in The Tower
>
> They're not benefits, they're just stuff.

Those things are only *potential* benefits, contingent on someone being born
to become the beneficiary. If no such person is born, they remain simply
useless inanimate objects of no benefit to anyone. A benefit always requires
a beneficiary, who by definition is already born, therefore the only thing
he CANNOT EVER receive as a benefit is *life*. QED