Ron wrote:

> In article >,
> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>>Ron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article . net>,
>>> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>anal leakage wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article >,
>>>>>Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>anal leakage wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because of their active, voluntary, fully aware
>>>>>>>>participation in a *process* that leads to deaths they
>>>>>>>>consider immoral.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let's apply this thinking to another example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No. You didn't honestly consider my example. Do that,
>>>>>>then maybe you can try again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>All you've done is to provide me with more evidence that it is time that
>>>>>we remove this feature from our laws.
>>>>
>>>>No. You actively support such laws. You WANT the
>>>>getaway driver in a robbery that results in a death to
>>>>be punished more harshly than the getaway driver in a
>>>>robbery that does not result in a death.
>>>
>>>
>>>Typically,
>>
>>Typically, you lie and pretend to avoid the obvious.
>
>
> You consistently demonstrate your intellectual

superiority to skanky little homo sophists.

Yes, I know.