View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dutch
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >, "Dutch" >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Ron" > wrote
>> >>
>> >> >> Imagine that. Two different 'moral codes' existing simultaneously.
>> >> >> The
>> >> > vegan who _chooses to believe_ that it is unacceptable to kill some
>> >> > animals for their food and the meat eaters who _choose to believe_
>> >> > it
>> >> > is
>> >> > acceptable to kill some animals for their food.
>> >>
>> >> That would be fine if that were the case, but it isn't. The vegan
>> >> hypocrisy
>> >> is that although they *profess* to believe that it is unacceptable to
>> >> kill
>> >> animals for their food, their actions invalidate this claim. Vegans
>> >> pay
>> >> people to kill animals willy-nilly to preserve their steady supply of
>> >> cheap
>> >> food.
>> >
>> > Name the vegan and the person they paid to kill what animal? I bought
>> > tomatoes last week, who did I pay and what did they kill?

>>
>> The vegan's name was Dolores, she paid Pedro the farmer and the animal
>> was
>> Ferdinand the mouse. You paid Juan to kill a lizard.
>>
>> Just as suspected, nonsense is not very interesting, why do it?

>
> Holding other vegans accountable for Dolores actions doesn't seem
> reasonable to me.


Dolores is accountable for her own action, paying Pedro.