Ron wrote:

> In article t>,
> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>>Ron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <_XqHd.6000$Nu.3438@fed1read04>,
>>>>>"formerly known as 'cat arranger'" >
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I believe that existence is a benefit.
>>>>>>It seems that species are incorrectly
>>>>>>divided up into individuals when they
>>>>>>they really are more of a continuum.
>>>>>>So the benefit of existence is to the
>>>>>>parents and the species. To the parents
>>>>>>in that their genes and their need to
>>>>>>continue is fulfilled and to the species
>>>>>>in that it is continued.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Continuation of a species requires death. One generation must die off
>>>>>for the next one to survive and thrive. The continuation of the species
>>>>>is possible through the dying off of individual members and over time.
>>>>>What does seem to be a contentious point is when and where the
>>>>>individual members of the species will die so that the species can
>>>>>flourish. There does seem to be a benefit to death.
>>>>
>>>>Not to the individual animal.
>>>
>>>
>>>The parent dies leaving room and resources for the children
>>
>>The parent would probably gladly trade some room and
>>resources for some additional time.
>
>
> Greedy and selfish.

Your opinion. You have revealed yourself to hold
primitive, poorly developed opinions.